I am not assuming in this particular case, but you have to take perspective of the geyser fund. Impossible to verify, but high risk from the political environment alone.
And just to reiterate, my original point is that inferring "AML regime intervention" instead of just a player hedging risks is over the top.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I understand what you're saying but I've supported that project over the last year and followed very closely. The money went where it was meant to go. Into food and shelter for those displaced by the Israelin aggressors. Shows us once again why we need to built more tamper- and censorship resistant services. The moment there is a company behind a project there's an attack vector to limit the service or even shut it down.