Yes, and unfortunately that kind of “cheap grace” version of Christianity became common in the last century, and has turned away a lot of honest truth seekers, especially young men. It was certainly promoted though, but so was Keynesian economics and a gender spectrum.
I think the new atheist critiques were apt to reject such silly versions of Christianity, the problem of course is that’s not historic Christianity but a modern secular version.
The deeper issue is that secularism is producing nothing but chaos and nihilism, and its core presuppositions are incompatible with Christianity. And of course our entire civilization and morality (such as universal human rights) is built on Christian presuppositions (this points back to Nietzsche’s famous death of God criticism, accurately predicting the atrocities of the 20th century)
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Interesting comments but I don’t think they are related to my initial post. I made a comparison between “verify don’t trust” and “trust can’t verify.” I appreciate that there is a wide and varied landscape of Christian theological development and evolution that has created a variety of Christian expression. There will be champions of many different theological systems all wanting to voice their particular views. I am wanting to focus in on the lack of independent verification a Christian has with respect to their “heavenly treasure” vs the Christian bitcoiners ability to independently verify their “earthly treasure.” As far as I can tell there is no verification mechanism available to a Christian re the rewards of exercising their faith. In that sense it is a “trust me bro” situation. I would be grateful if you could show me what I am not seeing here. 😀