Psilocyberbull's avatar
Psilocyberbull 0 months ago
And there lies the issue: You conflate a system that NEEDS to be engineered to optimize for a single use case (money) with censorship. Youre parroting very dumb and lazy propaganda. You dont know what non-monetary transactions are? Transactions where bitcoin isnt being used for the monetary network it was built as. Stop taking talking points from Jameson Lopp lmao he wont give you a job
↑ Parent

Replies (4)

Psilocyberbull's avatar
Psilocyberbull 0 months ago
Neal's avatar Neal
They dont differentiate the object. Protocol validity’s object is form. Censorship’s object is material content “My 5mb transaction got censored by the network! It’s supposed to be permissionless!!” As for filters and relay policy, that’s 💯 on the node runner. run and relay what serves you. that cuts boths ways, which is why the resolution to the spam war was always going to be at consensus lvl
View quoted note →
Psilocyberbull's avatar
Psilocyberbull 0 months ago
You know damn well what a non-monetary transaction is. And the "fees will outprice spammers" actually doesnt seem so obvious when you think about it for more than a few seconds. Theres already precedence for that
1 replies ↓
AU9913's avatar
AU9913 auggie@nakaMOtown.com 0 months ago
No I don't, show me one. It's fun arguing this bc the Knotzis think I'm a spammer and the core-munists think I'm a Luke acolyte. I actually think neither side has a fully flushed out argument
2 replies ↓
↑