Default avatar
Callum 11 months ago
I've yet to hear any real insight from him, and I read the DPR postings back when they came out. I've also listened to the 45 interview call he did from prison. In that call he acknowledged the stress he had put on his family (which his mother nearly died from) and that Silk Road may not have been good for Bitcoin (I don't think it was). So I acknowledge the greater maturity he showed in that call, but that maturity came from the self reflection that getting caught and going to prison can bring. He's certainly lived an interesting life and yes, SR was a part of the late early part of Bitcoin's history (but not part of the really interesting pre 2011 period). Karpeles also lived an interesting experience running Mt Gox but I also wouldn't look to him for insight into Bitcoin. Both were just operational players. Few ppl do actually have novel insights into Bitcoin to share. I just don't see why we should expect Ross to have any, when there's no history so far of him sharing any previously (that I'm aware of).

Replies (1)

OpnState's avatar
OpnState 11 months ago
I would disagree, with respect to your opinion. I also listened to some of his interviews and I do think he is quite charismatic. I also do think there is some rebel that remains, a rebel who may want to promote the cause of freedom (he is very vocal about that). I would expect someone like him to be much more impactful in the libertarian platform than say, someone like saylor. Saylor wants mainstream tradfi integration of bitcoin, and holds all his btc in coinbase after all. I think bitcoin benefits from every contribution made by every individual contributor with the right values. In bitcoin, it's not about one man saving all, it's where hundreds of thousands of people who seek freedom act according to their values in their own way, with their own means in their own individual local circles. I'm not looking for Ross to save me, but I do suspect he will contribute to the freedom cause in his own way.