THIS IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE. WE HAVE HAD OVER 1000 APPLICATIONS. THAT MEANS OVER 800 REJECTIONS. WE ARE ONE OF THE MOST TRANSPARENT AND EFFICIENT NON PROFITS IN THE WORLD. WE DO NEED TO GET BETTER AT COMMS/FEEDBACK. IT IS A PRIORITY.

Replies (2)

Default avatar
npub12262...grkj 11 months ago
“The most transparent”, says OpenSats, which does not disclose 33% (or more) of the board has economic ties to VC funds and companies with interests against Bitcoin or their grant selection process
> WE HAVE HAD OVER 1000 APPLICATIONS. THAT MEANS OVER 800 REJECTIONS. This implies you accepted 200 applications? Where is WalletScrutiny? Did you get that application? Do you count it as rejected? If so, could I have a rejection message, please? > WE ARE ONE OF THE MOST TRANSPARENT AND EFFICIENT NON PROFITS IN THE WORLD. Nah, I don't think so. That reminds me how out of the thousands of wallets I personally reviewed, most marketing claims include some variation of "best wallet". It's so universally present that it doesn't even serve as a red flag, although the best wallets tend to use that phrase less than the shadier ones. > WE DO NEED TO GET BETTER AT COMMS/FEEDBACK. IT IS A PRIORITY. Since when is it a priority, cause I'm trying to get feedback since months for an application I sent many months ago.