I agree. But I can see how some people might misinterpret. Again, he deserves my respect.

In his latest presentations unfortunately he is expressing pro spam attitude saying smth like - when transaction fee is paid this is valid transaction (no matter what data it includes) and that its the fees that will take care of spam which we see is not working at all and spam is increasing ... I personally was very disappointed. Also "one person's spam is anothers treasure" .... I don't even want to comment on it, there are more videos on that topic

this one too, so disappointing BIP 110 just limits big data, all big data the is spam and abuses Bitcoin and there is 0 decisions what is spam and what is not but he makes very very bad point and I am sure he knows what manipulation he is doing