If you read my feedback the only thing I have proposed is that you use NIP-39 for this as it is already designed for that purpose, and not trying to prevent its use.
The current *approach* you propose is technically inferior and therefore deserves pushback.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Any proposal should be separated into concept and approach/implementation. A proposal’s idea does not have to be bad for the implementation to be bad.
Nip-39 is not really the same. It requires basically reusing the nip-05 login on a case by case basis, where the code could just iterate the array of aliases where it does the nip-05 now. It seems like more technical debt than needed. It also does not even include any reference for nip-05 ids