I've been following this man for years. He's knowledgeable about a wide range of software and hardware and still does. Are you suggesting he's created his own alternatives to all of these? I've never heard him criticize open-source systems unless they have legitimate flaws, like Linux phones. He's often mentioned various AOSP alternatives, not just the one he sells. And speaking of that, anyone could theoretically do what he's done with his Android system and phones, which is why I've never felt the need to buy it.
Replies (2)
Nah my point is very simple. His content on iPhone privacy cannot be trusted as 100% factual because he has personal incentive to get his viewers to buy his product. If he was acting out of altruism or helping the community he would purely recommend graphene.
It’s particularly telling that nobody in the PrivSec community has even heard of his products. A phone, os, communication clients…far more likely this guy is a honeypot for people seeking privacy
I understand your concern, and it's valid. However, I don't entirely agree. A lot of what he says seems logically sound. Personally, I can't imagine ever using a closed-source OS again. As an African living in Africa, I see iPhone and the likes of Huawei as two sides of the same coin... Interests can vary based on the context.
