I really do like the difference between the two forms of power. It is true: a tyrant's power over a man is great, because he will capitulate with the tyrant to preserve his life; but a patriot freely gives yet more power to the country he loves, for he will give his life to protect her. "Greater love has no man than this," etc. The ancap types mistake deregulation per se as a means to freedom, but it only appears so now because current regulation hinders freedom. It is conceivable, however, that some regulation will increase freedom. Take for example the vows of marriage: when two form a family, but no protections are made for abandonment, do we believe the union is as free as it can be? If instead we vow to remain, and others are welcome to enforce it, the woman in particular due to that safety the vows provide can more freely make them. So too, when we have some economic mechanism that protects people from the wiles of cunning bad actors, we can yet more freely engage in commerce with one another. In this sense, a well regulated, that is to say optimally and not entirely, economy is more free than anarchocapitalists' dreams could conjure.