Hmmm... I'm slightly confused, as is usual. ๐Ÿคฃ I don't know what you mean by "a group state." While there might not be a need for an owner, I would want that ability in a private group so that I could moderate who has read/write privileges.

Replies (2)

Niel Liesmons's avatar
Niel Liesmons 7 months ago
In a Private group (especially MLS): - there are clearly defined Admin - there is a group state, in the sense that if you're not up to date with it, you can't encrypt messages any longer So it's not really appropriate for one-off communication. In Big-Tech land, the third party server is the hidden owner of the communication channel between 2 profiles that "DM" each other. Here we don't have that. So either you create a Private Group (with admin etc) or you send one-off messages that, imo, we should better call "Mail".
OK. Yes. That makes sense except for the fact that... Aren't all data packets basically mail, then? Please don't waste your time on my faffing about with this. I'll understand it eventually. ๐Ÿ˜…
โ†‘