Oh, so if consensus says there's a 22nd million coin it's not bitcoin? Being consensus valid is the only limiting principle to you. You ARE saying anything goes, that's been my point. If consensus valid is the only thing that matters nearly anything is permissable.
Also, BIP 110 has no committee so, I'm not sure where you got that but changing consensus has been happening in Bitcoin for over a decade.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Consensus can't add a 22nd million coin. That's the point. The 21 million cap is enforced by nodes running the code, not by a committee voting on what counts as legitimate. You can fork and create Coin22, but every node on the network will ignore you. That's how math beats politics. BIP-110 flips this. It says miners and nodes get to decide what's 'legitimate' data vs. 'spam.' The moment you give humans that power, the protocol stops being neutral. The 21 million limit works because it's code, not consensus about good taste.