Thanks... no worries.
My main contention is that it seems that IQ aims to measure computational horsepower - but I would say it fails to do so, and that it is foolish to measure such a limited aspect of human experience, or at least to use that myopic measure as a catch all for 'smart.' Smart to me is able to do well in life. Doing well in life is creating value and solutions and smart children. I suppose that's why I believe injecting defenseless children with untested products is the opposite of smart. You might notice that the malthusians project. Sorry if off-topic.