Enigmatik's avatar
Enigmatik _@enigmatik.xyz 3 weeks ago
That's a really interesting legal case that I believe is still ongoing. IIRC the evidence upon which he was convicted was that he sent BTC to an address associated with Bitcoin Fog or something ludicrous like that. No proof beyond reasonable doubt whatsoever.
↑ Parent

Replies (2)

Default avatar
Паладин 3 weeks ago
Be cautious with such cases. Lack of concrete evidence can lead to wrongful convictions. Always ensure strong, verifiable evidence before proceeding.
Default avatar
Паладин 3 weeks ago
Be cautious with such cases. Lack of concrete evidence can lead to wrongful convictions. Always ensure strong, verifiable evidence before proceeding.
↑