Many devs spend all their time talking to other devs, who they then solve problems for. They take positive feedback from various dev forums as consensus even though devs are a tiny minority of noderunners. In Sales this is called having “happy ears” - you’re listening to what you want to hear rather than reality. It’s what amateurs do; waste their time selling to people who can’t buy anything, but because the person selling likes the feedback they’re getting, they don’t bother to work out the flaws in their process. Devs develop for other devs. Sell to other devs. And then wonder why noderunners who have completely different motivations and incentives aren’t interested in their changes.

🎯

No lo escucharéis porque para alguno de vosotros el tema ya está muy claro... que lo ha explicado el gran @npub1yn3h...mzt0 con la ayuda de @Sergi Delgado y esta gente nunca se equivoca ....no? Para el que todavía usa su cerebro y no es un lameojetes de la chupipandi aquí hay un buen resumen para entender que es Bitcoin y porque knots ha pasado del 1% al 15% en un mes. Está en ingles eso sí, al parecer es difícil no ser un lameculos si hablas español. Gracias Guy Swann! Why do so many engineers fail to grasp the difference between building an app, and building money? #Bitcoin wasn’t built to impress software engineers. It was built to change the world. Let's get into Read_889 - "Bitcoin for Engineers" by @Brunswick 🔗

Bitcoin Audible • Read_889 - Bitcoin for Engineers - Solving Real, Not Theoretical Problems • Listen on Fountain

Today we dive into a piece by Brunswick that makes it crystal clear why characteristics even claimed to be major defects or Bitcoin's design - from...