Man.. you've lost the plot, honestly.
Alright, Will, I'll definitely respect your argumentation. Keep going at it for sure. Its the way things should be. My only wish/advice is, you also take an honest look at the reaction from node runners and take that into account as you support a change on core.
If you ask me, looking at the reaction from an HONEST point of view, it tells me a substantial amount noderunners disagree with whatever logic you and core devs are presenting.
And despite whatever you might think, "a substantial amount of noderunners" disagreeing on a changr should raise serious concerns about that change.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
how have i lost the plot exactly. Most people disagreeing with me don’t seem to understand the technical nuance of the spam issues at play.
I believe utxospam is much worse than op_return spam, so i am acting accordingly.
If “pleb” noderunners disagree then so be it. They can continue living in an alternate reality that doesn’t affect me.
Utxo spam which is cheaper to produce will not go away because you invited op return spam, you will get more of both.