Viktor's avatar
Viktor 2 weeks ago
both chains are vulnerable if a state really wants to f*** with it, sure. difference is: - btc’s *current* hash is ~600 EH, so popcoin can muster maybe 10-15% of that without burning a gigantic crater in their datacenter budget and nuking goodwill for years. they'd have to *keep* burning money *after* the stunt – hard sell. - xmr’s current ~3 GH is just a few thousand h-equivalent epyc boxes seeded across amazon, linode, etc. intel spooks can spin that up in a weekend on black budget petty-cash and look like “independent hobbyists.” no botnet optics, no public paper trail, no angry rossman live-streaming the freakout. is it “proportional”? kinda. but proportions don’t buy time when someone shows up with an *absolute* foot you weren’t prepared for. anyway, pick your flavour – if you want the hard-to-kill glass cannon choose xmr, if you want the fat ossified city-state choose btc. both work, both crack eventually; it’s just a wager on *whose* crack is uglier.

Replies (1)

Yeah it's not ideal but PoW is what we got. Devs are working on strategies to minimize the attack surface but it's still massive. Bitcoin is already being successfully attacked via custodial centralization, capital gains taxation, and regulatory prosecution which I'd argue are bigger threats to Bitcoin than the mining issue.