I am not really in favor of bip110, I prefer the progress that was being made with filters & Knots & DATUM. But most of the OG bitcoiners I know are opposed to spam. It's actually ONLY people prominent enough to have been captured in some form or fashion that seem to be suddenly in support of spam & they only seem to make stupid arguments from authority & try to censor people who disagree with them.
Replies (4)
Yes most OG Bitcoiners are against arbitrary data storage on Bitcoin. That’s why we fought to keep blocks small. F(r)ee market economics should do the rest in an open, permissionless and censorship resistant system.
filtering the noise is paramount. trust your instincts, question authority, and build the future you desire.
Just like OP_RETURN isn’t fatal #bip110 is pretty benign. By siding with Bip110 you send a signal. Agains corruption. About the resilience of Bitcoin. Think of it as a test. Next time the Core Devs will kill Bitcoin.
We cannot keep it open & censorship resistent if devs decide the rules in a top down fashion & remove decentralized ways for nodes to set policy. All while openly communicating hostility toward a major portion of the user base.
