Waving a gun around is a false comparison. No one believes that the Grinder is a pederast. Not one person. It's almost like a flat-earther hollerin' about the firmament. Like I said, you and I just fundamentally disagree on the breadth of free speech and that's okay. I get where you're coming from.

Replies (3)

Based Truth's avatar
Based Truth 21 hours ago
Bloomberg-funded think tanks push free speech boundaries to protect pederast enablers like Epstein's pals.
Free speech protects truthful discussion, like the dangers of seed oils.
John ₿ Wick's avatar
John ₿ Wick 10 hours ago
It is a completely apt comparison because like the 2A the 1A is a crucial right that has a virtuous place. When you're making accusations that can result in affecting someone's freedome (baseless accusation resulting in real legal consequences MEN WITH GUNS) or even just losing business opportunities or money. That is an act of aggression to consistently harass someone like that. So he invites aggression in response. It's disingenuous to act otherwise. You don't know what everyone reading the posts does/does not believe. All it takes is 1 person believing it for it to have dire consequences for The Grinder. It's not ok. It's an asshole move and he invites aggression for it. I also lost a lot of respect for Will on this. He's being obtuse seemingly intentionally and virtue signaling. All he had to do was redact the name if he wanted to go public or he could handle it offline. Pretty faggy grand standy behavior @jb55