And what about the innocent people who lose their coins not because someone broke their key, but because the open, decentralized, unfreezable protocol, froze their coins?
Login to reply
Replies (3)
it would be "for the greater good" (i don't agree)
even though I don’t agree with hard fork camp I’d say being ‘innocent’ shouldn’t relieve someone of taking gradual and necessary steps toward self sovereignty/custody/responsibility in light of such a looming threat
You have two choices - let a CRQC company steal their coins or freeze them and let those with a seedphrase (which is most modern wallets!) get their money back. It seems really dumb to cut off our nose to spite our face here.