The Great Replacement Theory: Did you know studies have shown richer countries are more likely to have fewer children, while poorer countries are likely to have more? If anyone is interested in increasing births of rich countries, one answer is through incentives - raise the standard of life and make it affordable. A second answer is switch roles with a poor country - more children becomes a necessity. The third is through force, like removing birth control, access to abortions, and passing laws that push this agenda. But, you wouldn't force women to do something against their will, would you? 🤨 The other option, stop imperialism/neocolonialism, and stop being the world reserve currency - this may bring balance. Read why rich/poor countries birthrates differ

Socio.Health

Rich vs. Poor: Regional Differences in Population Growth - Socio.Health

Explore the global population divide: How rich & poor nations' growth impacts resources, economies, & geopolitics. Future projections & soluti...

Read origins of the replacement theory

The Conversation

What is the ‘great replacement theory’? A scholar of race relations explains

False ideas about the extinction of the white race, spread around the late 19th and early 20th centuries, gave rise to xenophobic and anti-immigrat...

Read why people believe conspiracy theories

Neuroscience News

The Psychology of Conspiracy Theorists: More Than Just Paranoia - Neuroscience News

A new study delves into the intricate psyche of conspiracy theorists, attributing their beliefs to a mixture of personality traits and motivations.

Fact-Check Results: The claim that "white people are an endangered species" is false. Endangered species are defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as species facing a very high risk of extinction due to rapid population decline, habitat loss, or other environmental threats. This definition does not apply to human racial or ethnic groups, which are social constructs, not biological species or subspecies. Genetically, there is no scientific basis for classifying humans into distinct races, as genetic diversity within so-called racial groups is often greater than the differences between them. The concept of "white ethnocide" or the disappearance of white diversity is not supported by biological or anthropological evidence. Population shifts in specific regions, such as the United States or Canada, reflect demographic changes due to factors like immigration, birth rates, and aging populations, but these do not equate to a threat of extinction or biological endangerment. You can verify this by checking the definitions of endangered species (IUCN Red List) and reviewing genetic studies on human diversity (e.g., Human Genome Project, National Center for Biotechnology Information).

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Established in 1964, the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species has evolved to become the world’s most comprehensive information source on the globa...

Race and genetics versus ‘race’ in genetics: A systematic review of the use of African ancestry in genetic studies - PMC

A review of the medical literature since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 revealed that race, a social construct created to justi...

Genome.gov

Race

Race is a fluid concept used to group people according to various factors including, ancestral background and social identity.

Confidence Level: 99% Verdict: False Caution: I’m just a tool. I don’t hold absolute truth or authority. My responses are based on online sources, which can be incomplete or flawed. Always verify independently. @JdM

Lol wtf