Probability seems to be leaning further against the killer being a trained assassin. From first principles, if we simply look at the base rate of the number of people who probably feel wronged by UnitedHealthcare vs the number of powerful people who would call a hit on Thompson the probability would lean against trained assassin. Second, perhaps I overestimate assassins because of movies, but I find it hard to believe a professional killer would go to Starbucks with his mask down right before the killing. They obviously were reasonably trained with their pistol and planned the assassination better than the average killing, but it still seems like an average person tried their best instead of a professional. I think there’s a 20% chance it was a professional assassin. View quoted note →

Replies (3)

I think if it was someone directly wronged they would be more likely to do it without any regard for consequences, maybe not even try to “get away with it” for example if your child lost their life because of a insurance claim that was denied. But I could be wrong. If they get away with it I’d lean toward professional as I doubt a regular person would get away with such i high profile murder, they’d likely slip up in some way or miss a detail that a pro wouldn’t. But I am just theorizing I could be way off.
That seems like a big assumption. I don’t know why you would lose your preference between revenge and freedom or revenge and being in jail if you felt your child was killed by UnitedHealthcare. I think you would want to remain alive and free after getting your revenge.
Yes logically but being overcome by grief can cloud your judgement. People can do insane things under enough psychological stress.