The Legacy of Feinstein
-------------------------
Feinstein has passed away. Her political career parallels that of Biden, serving as a figurehead for forces operating behind the scenes. Despite a career solely in public service, including roles as a regulator, mayor of San Francisco, and U.S. Senator, her net worth as of 2018 was $87 million.
She exemplifies the Cantillon effect, where those closest to money creation benefit the most. Her long tenure in power likely stems from a desire to perpetuate this financial advantage. The wealth she amassed didn't just come from U.S. taxpayers; it also impacted some of the world's poorest and most vulnerable individuals. The expansive reach of the U.S. dollar has global consequences.
While mainstream media may portray her as a saintly figure, it's essential to scrutinize her actions, which should. be described as thievery and fraud.
She is what is a symbol of what's wrong with the system, why fiat money makes everything so political and why undeserving people like her get to rent-seek and make tons of money at everyone else's expense.
Thankfully, there's a way out, and that's Bitcoin. Only by taking away the power of money printing can these thieving oligarchs be stopped.
Login to reply
Replies (12)
WONDER IF HER PASSING WILL HAVE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACT ON HER RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN?
Don’t h8 the player h8 the game
Rip to the old lady

have you scrutinized her actions? which ones were particularly egregious?


And now she is at the judgement seat of King Jesus, the Perfect Judge who holds the keys to Hades! So to all who don’t believe in Jesus Christ, there is still time to repent and put your trust in Jesus! Do it NOW, for you do not know the day nor the hour that Jesus will call you to account, for we all will die (male and female), and after that the judgement! Please read the Gospel of John, the 4th book of the New Testament in the Holy Bible-the Word of God with an open heart and open mind, your eternal destiny depends on it!🔥✝️🙏😎
ding dong the witch is dead
Next!
While some of this may be true, I can imagine that in her decades of public service, she also helped make the lives of many people better with things she championed or helped make happen. May be best to look at people based on a more wholistic approach, but I understand that that would be a more complex way of presenting things. Simply saying everything she did was rent seeking is a patently unfair portrayal.
was she ever married? children?
Most of the public service is either openly malicious and corrupt, or just naive wealth redistributions under the threat of force. And most people are very blind to the unseen effects of these redistributions.
Of course, there might be individuals and individual cases which benefited from her. But if you want to look at her aggregate net contributions, then you should look how much wealth she helped to produce. Did she ever run a profitable business, or at least has been employed in one? If not, then her legacy is about being parasite on top of productive society.