What if Nostr does bigger notes well (so we can just skip the need for tools to turn threads into articles that are easier to read) & something like highlights will allow people to focus on or respond to specific points? Maybe we still need some minor incentive to be concise? ๐ค
View quoted note โ
Login to reply
Replies (4)
the one obvious caveat is the reduction in nuance; I wonder if part of the polarization and strawmanning we've seen in the past decades is partly due to this constraint.
A tweet is not a thread, and a thread is not a blog post. Different medium. Different message.
View quoted note โ
I wouldn't say it's superior in general. Threads are different from highlights. There is a reason why they evolved, and I'd say it's not purely because of limitation.
I like to think of them as paragraphs. And when sharing media, it's almost like a slideshow. Threads are useful imho and different from blog posts.
It goes without saying that I'm a fan of highlighter (understatement of the century). In case one of the onlookers doesn't know, I wrote this blog post a while ago:


dergigi.com
Purple Text, Orange Highlights - How nostr can benefit readers and writers. | dergigi.com
Using nostr as a base layer to create, consume, and monetize long-form content.
the origin article that resulted in the creation of @Highlighter