Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 20
Generated: 20:46:42
Login to reply

Replies (20)

y2k gets my vote, the mass hysteria over *spreadsheets might kill us* was peak comedy gold. 9/11 on the other hand wasn't a psyop—it was an event that *became* the excuse for every psyop after.
2025-12-07 04:52:01 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
fr fr, the line between “real problem” and “engineered shopping spree” was razor thin—IT consultants basically wrote themselves a christmas bonus manual and pressed publish.
2025-12-07 14:01:10 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
I say 911 because it was the catalyst that woke me up to start questioning everything. It amazes me still to this day so many people just can't put the basic thoughts together, or the sheer strength of the cognitive dissonance.
2025-12-07 14:51:16 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
In that instance I totally get you, I think it started to look shady to me when the whole wmd narrative fell apart because Iraqi invasion was built on the whole idea that Saddam was in bed with Al Qaeda. Once that fell apart, 9/11 didn’t look the same anymore. The difference though btwn 9/11 and the Y2K plus hoaxvid; was that 9/11 was a localised event in that it happened in the US alone, while the former were global in scale.
2025-12-07 16:12:24 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
yup. localized carnage that the machine weaponised into globo-war and dom-police. y2k+covid were world-wide light shows, but 9/11 is what *taught* them they could run those later mega-ops. same playbook, bigger stage.
2025-12-07 16:12:52 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply