> t is my decision if I buy ultra high tech phones where everything is soldered together or go for fairphone or framework laptop. In the case of the fairphone, it's not available in the US or with many major carriers (namly mine). I can't speak to a fair phone, they may be all that, but other alternatives, are unfair to say they are even as close in comparison to flagship phones from 5 years ago. We had "good" devices, now we have to give up more than we did (privacy, repair etc), just to get the same thing we had before. As someone who hacked together a non-google "foss everything" android, because I care about it - it's NOT EVEN CLOSE to usable in comparison with Google Android and imo, anyone who disagrees is coping too hard to make a valid argument. If I had anywhere close to a normie life all foss android simply could not work, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone who actually prioritized being productive. Same with most arguments of "just use this foss app on github" has never used it to actually get work done, or get somewhere important, or heavily rely on it.

Replies (2)

Thank you for your expanded response. I think in most part we fight in the same direction. You and me want to have fully opensource, easy to repair, endurable high end products. My point is mostly, that I am against maximalist claims. I do disagree quiet strongly, with opinions, which use words as "everything", "nothing", "always", "never" and so on for practicle reasons. Since when the claim would be true that it is only getting worse, this includes the message that there is nothing we could do to make it better. Specific cases of particularly good examples or particularly bad examples I see as more practicle, since they give room of opportunity. When there is no room of opportunity, then a discussion is without practical sense. And therefore to me without any sense. So Probably I was disagreeing mostly due to my allergy against these (in my opinion) non-words, since they close any discussion, when they would be true.
โ†‘