I followed this discussion a lot, and I resonate with your impression of it namely:
core devs are looking at it from a purely technical angle + economic incentive angle, but they are not considering AT ALLthe possibility of a malicious actor who only cares about hurting the network (and does not care about using more expensive ways to achieve this).
It almost fee like this "we already won and so we can do whatever" mentality has spread a bit too much....I'm worried about this arrogance/over-confidence, and lack of being cautious
Login to reply
Replies (2)
100%. Pride (and lack of humility) tends to come before the fall- so I am the most bearish on Bitcoin since I bought my first sats
Feels like the same incremental destruction of liberty that the government uses to control people and outcomes (not a perfect analogy but same vibe)
Segwit, taproot, now op return..
It’s just..
Don’t worry…pats head condescendingly
The devs know what they’re doing..
Spam is already getting through..
Trust the science..
I’m a retard when it comes to technical details but I am good at pattern recognition, so my nonchalant “Bitcoin don’t care” attitude is quickly shifting
tbh, I'd go for a 160 default, but this malicious actor stuff is all just FUD. It's possible today with inscriptions *and* OP_RETURN via libreRelay and a willing miner. Packing crap in the witness data has been possible for the past 4 years. What are they waiting for? "contiguous bytes", which this change makes slightly easier to do? That's the only thing stopping them?!