1. These are not mutually exclusive, not any more than DNS and IPv6 are. Your protocol should support MNS and Pkarr/Npubs ... One for throwaway accounts and one for stable identity. In fact Nostr already have Nip05 ... I just want to make that sovereign.
2. You touched on one of the two main problems my design needs to address. But it is actually the simplest of the two; you make it computationally expensive to create these Names, just enough so that a user can do it once with ease, but millions of bots break the bank, and you have trillion names so even millions of bots won't saturate it.
I will share the actual details once I have working prototype instead of just making promises.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
1. Ok, I understand now. It's a NIP-05 improvement making it sovereign. ๐
I dislike NIP-05, though. Some people misunderstood it as the identity itself, when it really is a DNS alias for the npub, as in nostr the identity lies on the keys.
I think it's more dangerous than useful, tbh.
2. Ok, PoW then. ๐ค
Looking forward to read the details!
Thanks for your answers.
๐ซ
Would zap