Yeah I obviously think choice is great and people should run whatever they want. But in this case I was referencing the free market of Bitcoin transaction fees.

What if one of the parties paying the "free market" transaction fees has an endless money printer? Would those fees be a deterrent from implanting something that can be used against the network later? Think long about this from the perspective of the owner of that money printer, since this network would be a threat to that power and monopoly

Even with unlimited fiat, trying to attack Bitcoin through fees would just expose how much of a threat it is to their monopoly.