also: pause and consider the amount of secondary information which could be learned by following on lead on the packet. for example: maybe you just start investigating what "lot #1" for this particular company means. then, other factors are introduced, including your ability to research. ideas are the same. think of the seed packet like a notebook full of quotes, citations, phrases, notes, complied and formed into a stack of developed concepts you plan to analyse further. you need other skills and resources to do that - and the interest and time to do it. otherwise: your idea is just a seed packet. and eventually, expires, is lost, becomes irrelevant for a variety of reasons - like old seeds.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
"will the seed grow"?
crypto and digital finance are based entirely on the probability and risk associated with doubt in natural process. so we now have entire industries built on risk analysis of whether something will do what it is naturally designed to do - NOT the provable idea itself.
"a human had an idea". "i have a seed". "god/nature creates life". those are source concepts. crypto markets ask everyone to bet relativist probabilities on whether those things will be something else eventually ever - NOT whether those things are.
that is the fallacy of how bitcoin is misrepresented in digital marketplaces.
the concept of transfer of data has nothing to do with the potential of the data itself; what are the properties of a seed versus the information about the plant which grows from that seed under natural conditions.