also no. you cant assume tx fits to your rules because of a "proof".
that would be the best compression ever created.
you are losing information.
its impossible.
as i said in the beginning "delusion of a solution"
Login to reply
Replies (2)
if you wanna run a full kaspa node good luck with 2tb.
and 100tb in near future
It’s clear you don’t understand cryptography or zero-knowledge logic. I’ve explained to you why you’re wrong and you’re just repeating the same wrong arguments.
YOU DO NOT NEED THE DATA TO PROVE THE MATH.
It really is the great paradox of Bitcoin maximalist religious zealots. They worship at the altar of mathematics and cryptography, yet they completely reject what cryptographic math is actually capable of achieving. They confuse data archiving with consensus validation. Your position is the only way to verify the state is to read every historical receipt (which you’ve never done). You need to study Merkle Trees, Polynomial Commitments, and Zero-Knowledge proofs. These proofs demonstrate with absolute mathematical certainty that a specific computational process was followed correctly, without needing to reveal or store the raw data that went into it.