The "Bitcoin community" should start it's own non-profit to pay devs. Especially if there are very qualified members. OpenSats is an organization. Organizations are not decentralized. They are centrally controlled. If you don't like Open Sats because you don't like 11.1111% of the board, I would consider donating to a different non-profit.
I understand your concern but your recommendation sounds entitled and irrational.
Login to reply
Replies (8)
You understand the concern so what would be the right way to address it for the good of OpenSats and the existing donation base it has?
I don't know because I don't run Open Sats. But even with NVK excluded, I trust the rest of the board and Gigi.
That literally what was said earlier. "They lose donations with him on the board." Meaning people ARE not donating if they don't like 11% of the board. The request to step down is a suggestion for Opensats, not you.
Poeple should understand what a "majority vote" means.
Dude are you really gonna hit em with a gO bUiLd It yourself note? How about you go fuck yourself. NVK and ODELL are both conflicts of interest when it comes to opensats and this BTClock bullshit is a prime example.
Wake up call if you build something and put it out in the public, people have the right to criticize your product or service and if you don’t like it fuck you.
Let's say @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 is hostile to anyone opposing his business moat when they apply to @npub10pen...n34f.
Which 4 other board members share the same interest that enables this bias?
Let's be specific and name names. They are all publicly listed. The easiest is @ODELL since he's invested in CoinKite.
Who are the other 3 and why would they be biased?
View quoted note →
how about donating directly to devs?
Like this?
Why wait?

View quoted note →
