That would probably be client dependent in this type of scenario. But again, that's fine because it demonstrates the openness of the protocol where any client can do whatever they want to do. I think it all comes back to having a wide plethora and wide variety of user choice. Why should what I say or what you say dictate what another user does or how I use another application or how the developer should build the application. I'm all for ultimate user choice and ultimate developer choice. Again, we should have a wide variety of literally everything. Don't get confused by my ramblings or have them be viewed incorrectly. I don't want censorship. I hate censorship but I think some people do and I think some developers do. So, if those clients existed then we will be able to showcase the versatility of Nostr. Do you understand what I'm saying?
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Thanks brother.
Maximize for freedom
You're free to post what you want.
Relay operators are free to host what they want.
You're free to host your own relay.
Users are free to block what they want.
Clients are free to block what they want.
Users are free to use whatever client they want.
View quoted note →

Client autonomy is key, our ancestors thrived on animal foods.