You aren't missing much, trust me. The retard in question kept making inaccurate claims about Nostr, while accusing it of being a "Nazi protocol". One such claim was that censorship could happen via the network effect (which it hardly can with the classic inbox model and cannot via the outbox model). It turns out, he thinks "network effect" means "mass adoption" (the actual meaning is that the utility of a service relies on its other users. A service can reach mass adoption without network effect, they aren't nearly the same).