First thing I would tacke is "Human friendly error messages."
Second thing is simplyfying wallets. LND, CLN and Eclair all cook their own stew in this regard. We have nostr - use it. NWC is literally made for this. No need to set up a reverse proxy, works from within Tor or through a VPN and whatever.
Third is making it less of an "exclusive club". Got no channels? Get rekt! ... This has to change. Not everyone has 100 USD flying around in a drawer to fund a channel to el-random-person and pray their uplink is and stays stable.
Fourth: Link to existing Bitcoin wallets. Use what you got and extend upon that. Why do I need separate BTC addresses? Feels redundant and more to manage than neccessary.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Agree, the list goes on and on...
-relies on large centralizing middlemen nodes for succesful routing and cheapest fees
-need capacity to recieve to begin with as you said
-limited in the amount you can send
-can't transact without both parties being online at the time of transaction
-can be rugged if your node is offline
-bad receiver privacy, IP is exposed by default, and hidden balances can be discovered by a passive adversary
-can be force closed onto the base chain against your will
-ability to grief honest users with zero cost
-worst of all it isn't a real solution for scaling for all the downsides you take on
Another big thing that recently came to light. Critical security issues discovered that are unresolvable without base layer changes (we both know how nearly impossible that would be)
lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-October/004154.html
I tried to zap you but there was a problem