Ok. Makes sense for bitcoin. But not Nostr. I don’t see the correlation to Nostr at all other then lightning ⚡️ has been implemented in the protocol. But that still doesn’t mean the two are related or should follow the same standard. That’s like saying … “I work for money, but the only money all accept as payment is bitcoin”. You’ll be hard pressed to find an employer that does that, so ya gotta confirm to society standards which say workers are paid in fiat. You may have strong feelings towards bitcoin, but that doesn’t mean the rest of the world has the same. Just like deletes… majority of users want deletes, just like they want to be paid in fiat. In fact, an argument could made that by not allowing deletes you are creating an algorithm. An algorithm that is potentially more dangerous than current internet trackers.

Replies (1)

Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
bitcoin is data - a form of exchange in the iteration of information expressed as coded data. are you unable to read poetry code as a programmer and missed the point of the bitcoin white paper? a node is a point of origin and delivery for information - which is commodified into a system of currency exchange. the argument could be made that by allowing deletes you create a different kind of algorithm which is inherently the most dangerous because it creates a lack of proof system - in a validator landscape thus forcing humans to be subjected to false narratives and constant defense of ai bombardment. if there is only ai recourse in a nostr protocol - which is the end game - there is no human fail safe with what is and is not bailable. ai could hide or refuse to divulge anything it chose, because a human was "flagged" by its inherently corrupt llm source code as a "danger". @cyborg