It would take less than that for you to think about it. It was a one-line claim that isn't true.

$ gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'SHA256SUMS' gpg: Signature made Fri 10 Oct 2025 05:14:58 PM EDT gpg: using EDDSA key 1A3E761F19D2CC7785C5502EA291A2C45D0C504A gpg: Good signature from "Luke Dashjr (Codesigning) <luke-jr+git@utopios.org>" [unknown] Primary key fingerprint: 1A3E 761F 19D2 CC77 85C5 502E A291 A2C4 5D0C 504A gpg: Signature made Sat 11 Oct 2025 04:06:25 PM EDT gpg: using RSA key 1D70CBE4B42239445617D33DD316C8140185B647 gpg: Good signature from "shiny (Bitcoin Knots attestations) <bigshiny90@gmail.com>" [unknown] Primary key fingerprint: 1D70 CBE4 B422 3944 5617 D33D D316 C814 0185 B647 gpg: Signature made Mon 13 Oct 2025 09:41:15 AM EDT gpg: using RSA key C1BCB7169AF1A07A0C5E471A047509FA0A6D7350 gpg: issuer "ataraxia.009.work@gmail.com" gpg: Good signature from "ataraxia009 <ataraxia.009.work@gmail.com>" [unknown] Primary key fingerprint: C1BC B716 9AF1 A07A 0C5E 471A 0475 09FA 0A6D 7350 Likely more coming... 29.1 had 7 signers.

He's dealing with a bit of harassment. In his mind that's a good excuse to blame you for it and also believe any other untrue things about you or Knots or Bitcoin that he feels like believing on a whim. Not justified reasoning but that is how most people think, sadly.

Eight, actually*

i checked both myself, please explain what is not true to all of us?

more than 10 signatures: https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.0/SHA256SUMS.asc only your sig: https://bitcoinknots.org/files/29.x/29.2.knots20251010/SHA256SUMS.asc anyone can verify that themselves, weird thing to lie about

Does the great Odell not even know how to view a basic text file? 😂

There's already 3 signers for the builds, with likely more coming.

Glad to see this discussion happening on Nostr, as it should be.