Replies (30)

Default avatar
npub1hkfu...ddvf 10 months ago
Lol what geometrical shape do you suggest then? A disk like shape? We can establish that all the visible celestial shapes are 'round'. Let's just stick to the sun and moon, because they can be seen with the naked eye. What would be the odds that, assuming the earth is no exception and behaves exactly like those in terms of shape, they all coincidentally face the earth with their flat side of the disk, at all times? Moreover, at least locally you can personally confirm that the proposed maps, where the earth is round, are correct. This holds up for all people. Since there is a big overlap of all people's local maps, we can conclude for the inhabited world that the maps are correct. That would leave little room for other geometrical shapes than a sphere like object
₿ujuX's avatar
₿ujuX 10 months ago
Wait, you think the world is flat too?
"You're focusing on the wrong things" "With love in my heart..." "You are scared/fearful for asking questions" These are all opinions/emotional projections. If you don't want to investigate this opposing view, that's completely fine, but it's weird to project your own emotions onto others who are trying to seek objective truth.
That article is referencing the "Flat Earth Society", which is a fake group intentionally put out to misrepresent the actual flat earth truths. Basically they exist to make the real flat-earthers appear more crazy by using dumb logic that doesn't make sense
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 10 months ago
The video mentioned a shrinking ship. Above shows a lowering ship below the horizon. Do better.
You cannot establish a spherical shape as nowhere can curvature be observed, apart from NASA fish eye lenses. Saying "The lights in the sky look(!) round, therefore the ground beneath my feet is also round" isn't really proof. The observable shape is a level plane.
Default avatar
npub1hkfu...ddvf 10 months ago
All bodies adhere to the same physical laws. It would be an anamoly if the Earth would not be spherical. Also, these same basic physical laws do an excellent job in describing trajectories of missiles, planes, other celestial bodies, etc, under the assumption that the earth is a sphere. Third, if the earth is actually spherical, the relative big diameter would make it look locally as a level plane to the human eye. I haven't heard a single good argument why it would not be spherical, but I am very open to alternatives and what the actual shape then should be and why...
You keep assuming this world is a similar thing as the lights you observe above in the sky. No laws make this assumption fact, but granted it is required to stay in the heliocentric trap. Diameter is actually tiny - there's numerous observations across hundreds of miles, impossible with any reasonable curvature calculation, as required by the heliocentric model. One enthusiast (jtolan) calculated a radius in the millions after a long range observation from a plane with IR filter. Many a globe skeptics have been made by simply deciding to dig for definitive proof of a globe. There is none.
Off the top: What will affect me is accepting there's nothing left to explore in this world, which is the mainstream/globe position. Also accepting human authority as supreme in a materialistic context might also affect me: "We are tiny and insignificant to the universe." Boy were they mad when someone checked the (microwave?) background. That's just two quick ideas how the narrative keeps you glued to the slavers leash.
Did you by any chance get to verify their data/raw footage? I'm still waiting for them to release any raw data, apparently they also brought compasses, temp gauges and more. It's been two months already and the skepticism will just increase unless they publish it all for everyone to verify. Anything else is just "trust me, bro"
Default avatar
npub1hkfu...ddvf 10 months ago
OK, let's run with the assumption that the earth is not similar to all observable other bodies. What shape do you propose and why? Do you dispute being able to fly around the world in latidunal direction? There are many combinations of flights that cover this whole direction. So, that would rule out a disk like shape, leaving something like a cylinder. Or what other topology do you propose?
Points taken. However, Inner-Earth Theroy has more legs to stand on (no pun intended) as well as historical evidence -- moreso than flat-earth. This also leaves us MUCH to explore. Why can't we be meaningless AND essential to the universe at the same time?
Default avatar
npub1y3wp...0jjd 10 months ago
Flat earth is the dumbest argument ever. What are you suggesting, that the Bible is to be taken LITERALLY? It’s a book of parables and metaphors on life. Oh, btw, who wrote that book? The Roman’s ruling class, by plagiarism of multiple other religious texts. Is the sun flat too? How about the moon? Are all the planets just floating giant coins? Are we on the heads or tails side??? Or are they a projection onto the “firmament”? 😆 Flat earth = no brains.
dustygrooves's avatar
dustygrooves 10 months ago
It sounds ridiculous at first. From what I found is that it’s not saying the planets are flat floating around in space. It’s saying space as we know it doesn’t exist, all that exists is this flat plane, and space as we’ve been taught is made up, for various reasons high level reasons.
Pfffff ridiculous that you guys don’t believe the innumerable modern and ancient scientists, but you’ll believe the old Roman ruling classes propaganda book. The Bible is literally a tool to control the minds of the masses, and it’s plagiarized form multiple ancient texts.