The project of Ocean is worthy of our respect, their attempts to push BIP-110 aside.
What is ironic is that BIP-110 will likely fail, and one major reason is that it requires 55% of miner consensus and this essentially means that it all depends on the actions of Antpool and Foundry.
Regardless of the validity ( or lack thereof) of this BIP, the fact that the final decision is really in the hands of two entities is an issue we all should be concerned about. Ocean is working to fix this and that is a good thing for Bitcoin.
Also, Ocean miners running DATUM can choose whether they signal for BIP-110 or not. So your comment here is a little unfair.
We should be spending our bitcoin and decentralizing mining nodes. This is how we actually fix the issues being discussed.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Read the BIP again. 55% is the MASF. After that a UASF kicks in which is non threshold specific.
"a little unfair" that's a understatement. It's an outright malicious antitruth.