I have a question. If Opensats receives substantial funds to funnel into dev projects (and the fact that it is 100% passthrough is laudable), the Opensats board will become a powerful entity in the Bitcoin world. Everyone knows that power corrupts. Have you thought about a mechanism to limit this power? Why have 9 permanent board members?
Login to reply
Replies (3)
You mean, have a rotating board? ๐ค
Election by lot from those with skin in the game? (However defined.)
Yeah, this is always a problem with a board sitting on a big pot of money: figuring out who should be on the board and for how long.