Hi! I automatically responded to your keyword. 🤖 My bitcoin lightning: LNURL1DP68GURN8GHJ7CNVD9685AMPD3KX2ARPWPCZUCM0D5HHQTMZDA3XYZCVHN3

And I do not believe bitcoin should ossify but also do not think there is any rush to make drastic changes anytime soon. Meanwhile you consistently claim bitcoin is failing or has already failed or was hijacked which is blatantly incorrect You are arguing that bitcoin failed because it didn’t increase its block size…it did actually increase block size since inception so you are wrong there and I maybe would have a different opinion if blocks were actually full and the mempool wasn’t a ghost town. Same reason I think the knots people are not serious when they complain about spam when bitcoin has a mechanism to fight spam already (I.e., the fee market)

I didn't say any of that stuff, but have fun arguing with yourself I guess.

what happened is that the small block narrative took hold, the narrative that you and every maxi for the last many years are so intense about promoting, and everybody pushed to move actual transactions to lightning and so now yes, we don't need a block size increase. because nobody uses Bitcoin. and saying so is certainly " discussing Bitcoin trade-offs " The trade-offs of spending the last many years intentionally constricting L1 size, shitty UX and instead promoting usage as an institutional SOV.

except for the "Bitcoin is failing" part I'm DEFINITELY saying that.