I'm trying to follow this. So NIP-22 says that you shouldn't respond to kind 1 events with kind 1111 events, and you say that restriction is completely unnecessary and makes no sense. And then you're saying that clients that honor the restriction don't display your kind 1111 responses to other people's notes, right?
But is there any self-serving motive behind not displaying 1111 responses to kind-1 events? Any unjust enrichment? I'm trying to understand the intrigue, if any.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I didn't think there was. I thought they were just being a bit lazy or overly-conservative and it made me exasperated.
But I stumbled across some oddness in the kind 30023 threads, today, and now I am a bit depressed about it all.