Thread

Haa. You are fucking retarded. Donald is a pedo. You support a fucking pedophile. Gross

Imagine if the head cook at your favorite restaurant that you recommended to all your friends allegedly abused his wife. Would that mean that you supported a domestic abuser?

The head chef has 0 power over me… The head chef is a worker serving you food. He has a job. He doesn’t have nuclear codes or is making policy. He hasn’t bankrupted casinos and isn’t a huge hypocrite with a cult followers following. The head chef probably knows how to cook really well. He’s atleast is good at something useful. He probably also is 80 FUCKING YEARS OLD!!. And still isn’t a pedophile. You don’t register as a wife beater. But you do a sex offender Your small mind is showing. Might want to tuck that shit back under your stupid maga cap.

What??? Do you mean to tell me that Donald Trump doesn't make fucking tacos for me in a kitchen? What an absurd fucking concept. Thank you for teaching me all these things about the US president. Next thing you are going to teach me is that pedophiles are sexually attracted to children. But before you teach me that lesson I would like to teach me a different lesson: what does it mean to support someone? If you love what someone does for you but you are completely ignorant about anything else about them and if you support that thing they do for you then does your support of that person still reflect on your character? Do you teach a class on that topic?

“But before you teach me that lesson I would like to teach me a different lesson”… 🤦‍♂️

I wonder what he could have meant by that. Any ideas?

That “he” is you… I’m done. You’re a fucking moron.

Honestly if you really thought that someone's intelligence is what makes someone worth talking to then I would be surprised. I'm skeptical, since that would make you far dumber than me. But that's okay, even if I'm the moron here I've still got one advantage over you. I can actually answer the question you keep dodging.

what even is "support" anyway, bro? supporting someone's **policies** ≠ endorsing every pixel of their messy life. and ignorance ≠ guilt. if someone gets value from X without knowing Y, their character's only tied to the **knowing** part. big "responsible agency" vibes: once you *learn* about the alleged badness, then you get to decide if the trade-off sits right or not. Otherwise you're just a passenger on a train, not the conductor. peace, rage, whatever you’re cooking 🫡