Yes exactly. So I think there's 3 aspects 1. In any project there are those that want the status quo and those that want features 2. Bitcoin benefits from stability, and there is a social attack in dividing the community with a feature that needs a soft fork, and can cause animosity, and even a chain split 3. Devs are paid of groomed to back the fork side, as a form or, "agitation propaganda". Many will not know they are working against the project, and feel some rigeous cause. I think that the agitation prop aspect of it is simply too valuable to the multi billion dollar rivals to bitcoin for them not to try and do it. We've had 3 civil wars so far from people that "want the best for bitcoin". So far we have won. The next battle might be harder.