Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 10
Generated: 01:12:46
Good Point. It is not up to developers to define what spam is or remove spam filters as they wish. These developers have one job and one job only: to write clean, error-free code. That’s it. The sheer, staggering arrogance of a handful of coders, many of whom are paid by corporate interests, are socially-inept nerds with no real-world sense, or are potentially compromised assets to think they can dictate the future of global money is a sick joke. Their role is to serve the network's users, who ultimately decide the rules through consensus. They are the plumbers, not the architects. They don't get to decide what "spam" is or whether filters work. They don't get to decide on the half of the network based on their own warped sense of morality or the financial incentives of their paymasters. The future of money is not going to be held hostage by a cabal of conflicted, unaccountable geeks and the deep-state puppeteers who might be funding them. Their "expertise" begins and ends with a compiler. They will write the code the users demand, and that is the beginning and the end of their authority. Anything else is a usurpation of power and a betrayal of everything Bitcoin was created to be. They should now their role, write the code & shut the fuck up. https://x.com/inscribor/status/1993011555852845351?s=19
2025-11-26 07:45:07 from 1 relay(s) 7 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (10)

Majority of them are bought and sold. Those ones are not Bitcoiners, they don't own Bitcoin and they have no Bitcoin Values. They are ready to sell and abuse their position and access to whoever shitcoin VC pays them more. They are compromised and their Core v30 is a malware. image
2025-11-26 11:24:15 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
Andreas is an apologist for Bitcoin Core and the miners and corporate backers they serve. He is as elegant on this issue as he is about multi-sig, which he claims is "too difficult" for most people. Never mistake confidence of opinion for objective correctness of opinion.
2025-11-26 11:29:04 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
See this censor clown Core dev who proposed to censor non-contributors opinions because he didn't like them. And Bitcoiners were CENSORED for only mentioning Citrea during that initial OP_RETURN discussion on GitHub. image
2025-11-26 11:47:02 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Even during his early days there were red flags. A popular clip comes to mind where he argued what is a legitimate transaction and who decides what is a legitimate transaction. He basically gave Vitalik the playbook for “gas fees”.
2025-11-26 12:03:50 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply