I find it a bit difficult to think of it this way for me. I think a temporary monopoly further limits social impact and development and shouldn't be the incentive. I think within the IP framework, they should probably be viewed differently, without being what I'm advocating

Replies (1)

BE's avatar
BE 8 months ago
I understand your point and agree it has merit. But incentives for publicizing creativity and investing the time and work to create are helpful to those who cannot create in any given category of work and yet benefit from access to what is created. There may be better ways to provide the incentives but the temporary monopolies of IP might actual speed rather than hinder innovation . It might also be different with respect to individual versus corporate or government innovators.