I agree with almost all that you say here, it was a great reading, thank you for you words. Also i want you to know that i know all nostr ecosystem since i'm here at before this npub, that is my third one, and this one was create in 31/03/2023, i've tried almost all that you show here. What i disagree with you is, Bitcoin is not totally decentralized because mining is totally centralized, 'is not because you can choose between the flavor red and blue that changes this', if law turns against miners you don't have where to run, this could be already solved - I agree with you that POW is the way, but it's not everything, and personally i like more the approach of Monero because it's vision is totally different about how to give power to people, i could include DarkFI because it's also POW, but is out of scope here. eCash does more harm than good because will create fractional bitcoin powered by central banks and the ones building with them - Check the Red Flags: Most of Bitcoiners today are NGU driven and not Freedom driven, and that makes me not be sure that about the immutable truths of Bitcoin, and that makes me think also that most will go wherever the big money from ETF/govs goes. Sec filling: ''With respect to any fork, airdrop or similar event, the Sponsor shall, in its sole discretion, determine what action the Trust shall take. In the event of a fork, the Sponsor will, as permitted by the terms of the Trust Agreement, determine which network it believes is generally accepted as the Bitcoin network and should therefore be considered the appropriate network, and the associated asset as bitcoin, for the Trust’s purposes.'' Blackrock Video Presentation thumb. ''There is no guarantees that bitcoin's 21 million supply cap will not be changes, has a fixed supply of 21 million bitcoins'' - This guys don't play small games and ''Focal Point'' maybe applies here. image Calle on Bitcoin magazine. 'You don’t have to be against the state to love Bitcoin. You don’t even have to believe in separating money from state” “The ECB is willing to also look into ecash systems that provide cash-like privacy for transactions under 300 euros. The Bank of International Settlements is piloting an ecash system right now. The National Bank of Switzerland and the Swiss Parliament itself are considering ecash deployments for their national digital currencies,”

Replies (5)

When it cones to mining it's very nuanced game, and after the great China ban everyone is allocating the capital very strategically across many jurisdictions. Stratum V2 pools are the way to go Braiins (Slush Pool / Braiins Pool) — ~9–11% — HQ: Prague, Czech Republic; primary regions: Europe (Czechia), global server nodes Foundry USA — ~12–14% — HQ: USA (New York); primary regions: North America (U.S. data centers), global nodes Antpool — ~10–12% — HQ: China (Ant Group); primary regions: Asia (China, Central Asia), global infra F2Pool — ~9–11% — HQ: China; primary regions: Asia (China, Singapore), global nodes I don't mind seeing the current proverbial 1% being dominated with bitcoiners in two decades. For transactions we will have to use many solutions, lightning, ark, bitvmx and each will have its downsides but it's easy to imagine a massive volumes anchoring to the layer1, outcompeting currently popular jpegs phenomena bloating utxo set We have over 60 different implementations for NOSTR relays, and only 3 for bitcoin node, it would be nice to see more than three. To me bitcoin is a monetary network, for data storage with public key cryptography they can use NOSTR + blossom servers, nostr badges are cool.
I missed one of the most important points here and it is BIS and if you know how money works you know than when BIS talks all counties that you mention above obey. There are only 3 exceptions countries, but don't expect that they will not align the same, because if they want to keep doing international businesses and they all want, they all again have to shut up to BIS and obey. https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull111.pdf
Russo's avatar Russo
## Bitcoin Reserve: How govs will steal from you to build the reserves? The evolving landscape of Bitcoin is increasingly influenced by state-level tracking and regulatory frameworks. As governments develop systems to monitor and control Bitcoin transactions, the implications for users and the market are profound. ### The Trackability of Bitcoin at State Level Bitcoin operates on a public ledger, making it **pseudonymous**. While individual users can maintain privacy through various techniques, state-level entities can effectively track transactions. - **Chain Analytics**: Firms and government agencies can analyze transaction flows and link them to real-world identities, especially when users interact with regulated services. - **Revelio Insights**: The Revelio paper illustrates how network-level observations on ligthning network can reveal custodial holdings and flows, enabling state-level attribution. ### The Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Wallet System A new regulatory framework is emerging that distinguishes between custodial and non-custodial wallets: - **KYC/AML Compliance**: Regulators will require that wallets and custodians interoperate only through channels that enforce Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules. - **Isolation of Non-Compliant Wallets**: Wallets that do not comply will be unable to transact with regulated entities, effectively isolating them from the broader financial ecosystem. ### The Mechanics of Blocking and Seizing Funds States are developing mechanisms to control Bitcoin transactions, which could lead to the seizure of funds: - **Transaction Failures**: When a user attempts to make a purchase, if the transaction fails compliance checks (e.g., BIS), the funds are blocked. - **Government-Controlled Reserves**: Blocked funds will be redirected to a government-controlled Bitcoin reserve, effectively allowing states to seize assets under the guise of regulatory compliance. ### Market Implications for Users The implications of these developments for users are significant: - **Reduced Autonomy**: Users relying on regulated exchanges and custodial wallets will find their assets increasingly linkable and subject to seizure. - **Increased Friction**: The need to comply with KYC/AML regulations will create barriers for users, limiting their ability to transact freely. ### Last but not least The combination of state-level tracking and a bifurcated wallet system creates a plausible pathway for governments to seize Bitcoin. As compliance becomes a requirement for interoperability, users must navigate a landscape where their assets are at risk of being redirected to government reserves. This shift fundamentally alters the original vision of Bitcoin as a decentralized currency, raising critical questions about user autonomy and financial freedom. #bitcoin #nostr #grownostr #monero
View quoted note →
BIS control all central banks of the world, when that law is passed, you don't have where to scape, like in the Chinese case
also, every dev knows how they will enforce this, but no one has the courage to tell you besides the little ones that still care about where bitcoin ends like me.