> My point is that NO one should EVER lose ANY money from a custodial system. Not a single sat. Regardless of how new things are.
I don't understand what you mean here. Is it "No bugs should cost normies money" or "There should be recourse for people running mints and then just walking away with the funds" or "Nobody should use custodial services as they are inherently bound to lose at least some of them money"?
Login to reply
Replies (1)
If the mint loses money, users should be able to sue the mint operator for some of the companies/individuals assets. However, usually mints don't provide any legal terms of use that can define an appropriate relationship between users and operators. Apps should not list any mint that doesn't provide legal protections to the users.