Trump, who you say is so bad and evil - you say that in summary, I have a habit to rarely state my opininons, I let facts speak, that made you believe I said that (which means the facts spoke to you as well). But even though you got the message - you don't actually agree with my description of his business model he used to form his 'real estate empire' was fraud, why else distance yourself with "who you say"? Under a direct femocr environment? What is that? Is your description of a functional society a female governed one, or do you just want to impress me - I think your mind is so used to expect uncertainty of mind and hope to shake me with such a word? Well I certainly shake my head. We swiss don't fall into that trap, we think, which is the same as doubt, therefore we are. If we discuss things of matter, we leave gender at home, as well as religion or other belief systems irrelevant. And if someone tries to talk more than half a minute about such stuff, we know that we should do the same as with religious people - not argue, just ignore them and make sure they don't get a position where they can spread their opium, make sure that the state is truly separated from belief. Wealth inequality is the number one reason why a society crumbles and their democracy with them. I suggest thinking about the consequences. Wealth inequality is healthy for the economy though, the investor can definitely do more with less, the question is, are you willing to loose free will and speech, freedom to walk without bodyguard, and neighbourly human connections and then retreat into a small town of the wealthy, where the rich govern themselves, educate their children themselves, simply put: Risk the Storming of the Bastille?

Replies (1)

↑