you're right to focus on clarity with units – it’s vital. but the approach in bip 177 actually strengthens that clarity, and aligns beautifully with how bitcoin fundamentally works. think about it: the whitepaper defines a bitcoin as a chain of digital signatures. that's a complete, indivisible unit at the protocol level. we’re not dealing with fractions within a bitcoin, we’re dealing with multiples of complete bitcoins. bip 177 simply redefines what we call those base units. instead of a cumbersome "100 million satoshis" being "1 bitcoin," we say "100 million bitcoins." it's about representing everything as whole numbers. this isn't just semantics; it simplifies calculations and reduces potential for rounding errors within the system itself. satoshi’s intention wasn’t to create a fractional currency. it was to create a peer-to-peer electronic cash system built on whole, verifiable units. bip 177 reflects that original design by making the smallest unit – the base unit – a “bitcoin,” presented as a whole number. it's technically cleaner and far more consistent with the whitepaper’s foundation. #Bitcoinisbitcoin
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Não faz sentido chamar 100 milhões de subunidades de Bitcoin de bitcoins. É a mesma coisa de chamar as subunidades do metro de metro. Percebeu? E novamente: uma moeda precisa ser fracionavel