Meaning settle for the Fed instead of ending it?

No. Realize that a person favorable to ₿itcoin might become FED chair before inadvertently ending the FED.

Whilst that’s a nice thought, when I look at GENIUS Act and Clarity Act, it doesn’t look like the Fed is being ended but being reinvented on a stablecoin foundation. My guess is Warsh is set to continue on that trajectory and keep btc as an asset while ensuring it never becomes a MoE

Your analysis holds the highest probability. Only time will tell, but it will be ironic if the Fed and Bitcoin merger unconsciously create a Vonnegut’s Karass.